Thanks, Jon! If you want to add warn_unused_result, that seems fine to me. --David
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 3:57 PM, JonY <jo...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > On 8/18/2015 02:20, David Grayson wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 6:22 AM, Jacek Caban <ja...@codeweavers.com> wrote: >>> The patch looks good to me. >> >> I think it's good too, but it looks like it (intsafe_2.2.1.patch) >> hasn't been committed to the git repository. Can someone commit it? >> > > Does it make sense to add the warn_unused_result attribute? I'll commit > soon if nobody has yet. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Mingw-w64-public mailing list > Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
