On Tue, 6 Sep 2005 15:25:29 -0500, John Brooks wrote:

>My office network has an adsl connection with a single static 
>ip as follows:
>
>   209.145.160.141/24  (gw 209.145.160.1)
>
>I requested additional ip's from my provider and they gave me
>8 addresses at:
>
>   207.246.198.216/29
>
>They are routing all 8 of these new addresses down my adsl
>'pipe'. On my OBSD box I can alias any of these 8 addresses
>to the outward facing nic and reach them from the outside,
>so I know that they work. 
>
>Now I want to set up another OBSD box to use one of these
>addresses (which are no longer aliased to the first box).
>
>
>(209.145.160.141)
>OBSD #1 ---------
>                 \
>                 Switch ---- DSL Modem ---- ISP(209.145.160.1)
>                 /
>OBSD #2 ---------
>(207.246.198.220)
>
>I was expecting that 207.246.198.217 would have been set up as 
>the gateway on the ISP's end, leaving me with 5 useable addresses. 
>
>I don't want to NAT box #2 behind box #1. Are there some 
>routing commands that would allow me to send traffic to 
>the ISP from box #2 using these new IP's?
>
>Thanks,
>
>--
>John Brooks
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>
>

Hi John,

I've been doing the ADSL with a routed /29 for servers in addition to
having a NATted LAN behind the same firewall. You can probably use some
of the tricks I get up to to conserve addresses.

Let us know what modem you are using, whether you are doing PPPoE or
PPPoA or whatever and I'll tailor my reply to suit. You can get into
lots of frustration by taking "obvious" approaches to this problem,
only to find that they result in more problems rather than solutions.

I don't see why you need all of that pain.

>From the land "down under": Australia.
Do we look <umop apisdn> from up over?

Do NOT CC me - I am subscribed to the list.
Replies to the sender address will fail except from the list-server.

Reply via email to