hmm, on Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 05:25:11PM -0300, Pedro Martelletto said that > bugs@ is the right place to go, preferably with a (filled) formal PR > like the ones sendbug(1) generates for you. Having two separate lists is > the only way we have to differentiate between the usual amount of > discussions that this list is meant for, and punctual bug reports that > could be worked on.
i know very well how to report bugs thank you very much. been on the list for quite some time now. to use your car repairsman example: do you expect me to wreck my car AGAIN so just i can report you what went wrong? i am sorry but my files are not rabbits to conduct experiments on. this is the biggest problem with file system bug reports. i don't have 40 systems lying around like Theo does. regarding my other issues, because you had the courtesy of lecturing me, let me sink that low and ask you: have you searched the archives? http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-misc&m=110488032901414&w=2 http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-misc&m=110246291210267&w=2 look, i am really not a rude person. not at all. and being an openbsd otaku since 2.6 i have never sunk that low as to rant about openbsd. this is the system of my choice since 2.6 and i help when i can. and i know how it goes around here, because i am not willing to/and simply can't sacrifice my files perhaps the dev's will tell me to piss off w/o a proper bug report. suits me fine, what could they do? sacrifice _their_ files? i am sorry to see that solid fat32 support is just not a priority for openbsd. i can understand that, i don't imagine Theo has a dual boot fat32 shared partition on any of his machines. in any case, i expect the devs to do the same they always do with an underperforming subsystem: disable until fixed. that's the openbsd way. -f ps. and it's really a _shame_ that i can access my openbsd partition without a hiccup even from xp. http://ffsdrv.sourceforge.net/ heart paining shame. -- the smallest handcuff in the world is a wedding ring.
