On 29/12/2012 2:28, Andres Perera wrote:
Consider GNU autoconf. the output isn't derivative work of the source
files, regardless of how big their BSD headers are.
That's the biggest problem with autoconf, imo; not the idiosyncrasies
of the language.
Since when documentation is a derivative work of something that is not
documentation? Obviously, I consider a derivative work, to something
that if you do reverse engineering or decompile ont, you can get more or
less to the original code, which is not the case.
