> From: YASUOKA Masahiko > Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 3:20 AM > > % ospfctl show fib | grep 128 > * 56 10.128.120.0/24 127.0.0.1 > * 56 10.128.120.213/32 10.0.0.1
Interesting, not only does it show a /24 route, it looks like it has it marked as valid. Is this with pppx or tun? IIRC, when I tested tun ospfd found a /24 route, but still didn't propagate it. > And do you know why the ospfd doesn't use "the whole /24"? No, not a clue :(. I tried posting an inquiry to the tech list in the hope someone familiar with the guts of osfpd might comment, but no responses so far. > Even if tun(4) is used, packets are processed in-kernel. Ah, I had thought pipex was just for pppx, but now I see in the man page it says "pipex is used with tun(4) and pppx". What's the difference between tun and pppx in the context of npppd then? Is there any particular reason to use one versus the other for an L2TP VPN? Thanks much.
