On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 04:54:55PM -0300, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote: > Em 18-03-2014 15:56, Kevin Chadwick escreveu: > > On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 11:23:12 -0300 > > Giancarlo Razzolini wrote: > > > > It's perfectly useful, mail is only dropped by some idiotic systems > > (already mentioned) that don't understand or care about more effective > > anti spam methods or the little guy and when the big guys cause almost > > all of the spam. > But there are still these idiotic systems that won't deliver you mail if > you do not have reverse dns name.
They deliver, but to SPAM folder. Google work like this. But e.g. yandex.ru, mail.ru work ok with no rDNS > > Except that if whoever has just been using that ip address is part of > > a botnet or likes mass mailing then you may well get blocked as you > > have no trackable reputation. There are things like DKIM but they > > aren't universally checked yet and serve more as assurance than > > combating spam. DKIM should be coupled with spf too. > Yes, that is why I use amazon ses for the sending part. And I also use > spf, of course. > > -- > Giancarlo Razzolini > GPG: 4096R/77B981BC
