Em 18-03-2014 09:44, Kevin Chadwick escreveu: > previously on this list Jean-Philippe Ouellet contributed: > >> Also, "absolutely sure privacy is totally respected"??? >> Let me know when you find a jurisdiction in which you can reasonably >> expect that to even be possible to begin with. > Yeah, I believe you have to pin STARTTLS for each host manually for it > not to be easily circumvented. > > If you just wish to avoid search companies scanning your mail content > for keywords then I expect there are many providers to choose from. > > Otherwise forget the server and use gpg and protect your host or look > for an ISP that gives you a static IP. I find I still have some trouble > with higher paying Cisco customers like banks though using dumb > filter methods. > A static IP address without a meaningful reverse name mapping such as mail.myopenbsdhomeserver.com isn't very useful. Most ISP's wont do reverse mappings or will charge your eyeballs for it. Also, you can host anything these days using dynamic ip addresses. If your IP address changes you will stay a few seconds without receiving any mail, and also may have some mail delayed, but you shouldn't lose anything. And you can use services for relaying your mail, instead of sending them directly from your home server. I use amazon ses and it works like a charm. It has DKIM and most mail servers accepts their mail without any problems.
-- Giancarlo Razzolini GPG: 4096R/77B981BC
