On Sun, 22 May 2016 09:32:47 +0200
Reinhold Straub <demarc...@web.de> wrote:
> On 21.05.16 01:12, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>
> > I think the site is fine. Thanks for the table above. I agree
> > there would be value in small tweaks to improve the view for narrow
> > displays.
>
> Wouldn't it suffice to replace
>
> <img border="0" src="images/puffy59.gif" height=199 width=599
> alt="[OpenBSD 5.9]">
>
> with
>
> <img border="0" src="images/puffy59.gif" height="100%" width="100%"
> style="max-height:199;max-width:599" alt="[OpenBSD 5.9]">
It doesn't seem like this change offers any merit whatsoever.
It could even be simplified:
<img src="images/puffy59.gif" alt="[OpenBSD 5.9]">
Using XHTML 1.0 Strict wouldn't be a bad idea, since this is supported
on all modern browsers, and even Dillo and Lynx support it. At the
moment the page triggers the browsers' "quirks" modes.
Just some food for thought.
>
> ?
>
> And insert
>
> <style> a {text-decoration:none} a:hover {text-decoration:underline}
> </style>
>
> to get a more pleasant appearance of the hyperlinks?
>
Because that would confuse users; is conventional to have links as
underlined text all the time.
