>                existing site              proposed new site
>                -----------------          -------------------------
> window width   wide       narrow          wide               narrow
> 
> firefox        great      mediocre (2)    mediocre (3)       poor (3,4)
> arora          great      mediocre (2)    medoocre (3)       poor (3,4)
> midori         great      mediocre (2)    mediocre (3)       poor (3,4)
> xombrero       great      mediocre (2)    mediocre (3)       poor (3,4)
> netsurf        great      mediocre (2)    poor (3,5)         poor (3,4)
> dillo          great      mediocre (2)    poor (3,6)         poor (3,6)
> lynx           ok                  ok     ok                 ok

We rarely do whole-scale replacements of anything in OpenBSD, unless
there is compelling reason the old should be discarded.  I have
probably received 500+ proposals for website rewrites, a handful with
the effort already expended.  This is another offer which will be
rejected.  It is kind of sad.

I think the site is fine.  Thanks for the table above.  I agree there
would be value in small tweaks to improve the view for narrow
displays.

This is a project that does rapid incremental changes.  This entire
concept of throw-it-away, you-want-the-new-warts; I don't get where
it comes from.

Reply via email to