Anybody who had used automatic disk allocation, it would have taken care of this:
http://man.openbsd.org/disklabel#AUTOMATIC_DISK_ALLOCATION /usr/local 10% of disk. 2G – 10G On 9 June 2016 at 15:53, Kapetanakis Giannis <bil...@edu.physics.uoc.gr> wrote: > On 08/06/16 22:02, Mihai Popescu wrote: >>> >>> Sorry, no, I should have been clearer. >> >> Man, so much confusion in this thread. All are mixed in usage: >> partition, mount point, filesystem, mount options, etc. Aren't they >> different anymore? I was reading about wx_ stuff since I will install >> a new snapshots, but this thread is too damn unclear. >> >> Sorry. >> > > I think it's quite clear. If you want run programs that violate W^X > protection, for instance some programs from ports might have problems with > W^X, > then you have to mount the filesystem under which the program exists with > wxallowed. > > Since ports are installed in /usr/local you have options like: > > a) if you have a separate /usr/local then you mount /usr/local with > wxallowed option > b) if you have only /usr then you have to mount /usr with wxallowed option > c) or create a new /usr/local filesystem, move old /usr/local (from /usr > filesystem) there and mount that with wxallowed > > If you install a new system, then recommended to create a separate > /usr/local from start... > > G
