Hi {Ingo,Darius,misc@},
Ingo Schwarze <schwa...@usta.de> writes:
> Hi Dariusz,
>
> Dariusz Sendkowski wrote on Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 08:27:07PM +0200:
>
>> OK, but from which branch?
>
> We don't use branches in OpenBSD.
> Just use the HEAD of the OpenBSD CVS repository.
>
> You don't need to worry about merging to the portable mandoc
> on mdocml.bsd.lv. That's a no-brainer i'll take care of.
>
>> Can the results be sent incrementally?
>
> Yes, that's ideal.
>
> Don't work for days before sending anything. Imagine you misunderstand
> something and only learn about your error after having wasted days
> of work. That would be bad. Or imagine two people start working
> on the same task and work for days, both preparing the same huge
> report. That would be a waste, too. That cannot happen if you
> send results incrementally right after finding them.
Sorry I'm late to the party, as usual, but I had some trouble getting
my -current setup back to a reasonable state. I would like to pitch
in on this if it is still needed, and don't want to duplicate work. I
have a list of 221 hits for %s in /usr/src/usr.bin/mandoc in front of
me. Shall I start at the top or has that already happened?
> In general, OpenBSD prefers small patches that are easy to understand
> and verify, in particular from new contributors. They need not be
> easy to produce, though.
>
> Yours,
> Ingo
Pax, -A
--
http://haqistan.net/~attila | att...@stalphonsos.com | 0x62A729CF
