Dariusz Sendkowski <dsendkow...@gmail.com> writes: > From the list below: > > 27 cgi.c: > 4 dbm.c: > 5 dbm_map.c:
I'll start on these three... > // 3 eqn.c: ... and check you here. When I get that far I'll post again, or if it's taking me longer than I thought it would I'll post at the end of the day anyway. > 5 html.c: > 20 main.c: > 2 man.c: > 2 man_html.c: > 5 man_macro.c: > // 2 man_term.c: > 9 man_validate.c: > 37 mandocdb.c: > 2 manpath.c: > 23 mansearch.c: > 4 mdoc_html.c: > // 10 mdoc_macro.c: > 1 mdoc_man.c: > 2 mdoc_term.c: > 43 mdoc_validate.c: > 6 read.c: > 13 roff.c: > // 1 tag.c: > // 1 tbl_layout.c: > // 1 tbl_opts.c: > 6 term_ps.c: > 11 tree.c: > > I've checked the commented (//) files so far and they look fine. You can > recheck or take new ones. > Unfortunately, I don't have as much time as I'd like to so this goes rather > slowly. > See you in a few hours :-) Pax, -A > > > 2016-08-09 18:41 GMT+02:00 attila <att...@stalphonsos.com>: > >> Hi {Ingo,Darius,misc@}, >> >> Ingo Schwarze <schwa...@usta.de> writes: >> >> > Hi Dariusz, >> > >> > Dariusz Sendkowski wrote on Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 08:27:07PM +0200: >> > >> >> OK, but from which branch? >> > >> > We don't use branches in OpenBSD. >> > Just use the HEAD of the OpenBSD CVS repository. >> > >> > You don't need to worry about merging to the portable mandoc >> > on mdocml.bsd.lv. That's a no-brainer i'll take care of. >> > >> >> Can the results be sent incrementally? >> > >> > Yes, that's ideal. >> > >> > Don't work for days before sending anything. Imagine you misunderstand >> > something and only learn about your error after having wasted days >> > of work. That would be bad. Or imagine two people start working >> > on the same task and work for days, both preparing the same huge >> > report. That would be a waste, too. That cannot happen if you >> > send results incrementally right after finding them. >> >> Sorry I'm late to the party, as usual, but I had some trouble getting >> my -current setup back to a reasonable state. I would like to pitch >> in on this if it is still needed, and don't want to duplicate work. I >> have a list of 221 hits for %s in /usr/src/usr.bin/mandoc in front of >> me. Shall I start at the top or has that already happened? >> >> > In general, OpenBSD prefers small patches that are easy to understand >> > and verify, in particular from new contributors. They need not be >> > easy to produce, though. >> > >> > Yours, >> > Ingo >> >> Pax, -A >> -- >> http://haqistan.net/~attila | att...@stalphonsos.com | 0x62A729CF -- http://haqistan.net/~attila | att...@stalphonsos.com | 0x62A729CF