Dariusz Sendkowski <dsendkow...@gmail.com> writes:
> From the list below:
>
> 27 cgi.c:
> 4 dbm.c:
> 5 dbm_map.c:
I'll start on these three...
> // 3 eqn.c:
... and check you here. When I get that far I'll post again, or if
it's taking me longer than I thought it would I'll post at the end of
the day anyway.
> 5 html.c:
> 20 main.c:
> 2 man.c:
> 2 man_html.c:
> 5 man_macro.c:
> // 2 man_term.c:
> 9 man_validate.c:
> 37 mandocdb.c:
> 2 manpath.c:
> 23 mansearch.c:
> 4 mdoc_html.c:
> // 10 mdoc_macro.c:
> 1 mdoc_man.c:
> 2 mdoc_term.c:
> 43 mdoc_validate.c:
> 6 read.c:
> 13 roff.c:
> // 1 tag.c:
> // 1 tbl_layout.c:
> // 1 tbl_opts.c:
> 6 term_ps.c:
> 11 tree.c:
>
> I've checked the commented (//) files so far and they look fine. You can
> recheck or take new ones.
> Unfortunately, I don't have as much time as I'd like to so this goes rather
> slowly.
>
See you in a few hours :-)
Pax, -A
>
>
> 2016-08-09 18:41 GMT+02:00 attila <att...@stalphonsos.com>:
>
>> Hi {Ingo,Darius,misc@},
>>
>> Ingo Schwarze <schwa...@usta.de> writes:
>>
>> > Hi Dariusz,
>> >
>> > Dariusz Sendkowski wrote on Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 08:27:07PM +0200:
>> >
>> >> OK, but from which branch?
>> >
>> > We don't use branches in OpenBSD.
>> > Just use the HEAD of the OpenBSD CVS repository.
>> >
>> > You don't need to worry about merging to the portable mandoc
>> > on mdocml.bsd.lv. That's a no-brainer i'll take care of.
>> >
>> >> Can the results be sent incrementally?
>> >
>> > Yes, that's ideal.
>> >
>> > Don't work for days before sending anything. Imagine you misunderstand
>> > something and only learn about your error after having wasted days
>> > of work. That would be bad. Or imagine two people start working
>> > on the same task and work for days, both preparing the same huge
>> > report. That would be a waste, too. That cannot happen if you
>> > send results incrementally right after finding them.
>>
>> Sorry I'm late to the party, as usual, but I had some trouble getting
>> my -current setup back to a reasonable state. I would like to pitch
>> in on this if it is still needed, and don't want to duplicate work. I
>> have a list of 221 hits for %s in /usr/src/usr.bin/mandoc in front of
>> me. Shall I start at the top or has that already happened?
>>
>> > In general, OpenBSD prefers small patches that are easy to understand
>> > and verify, in particular from new contributors. They need not be
>> > easy to produce, though.
>> >
>> > Yours,
>> > Ingo
>>
>> Pax, -A
>> --
>> http://haqistan.net/~attila | att...@stalphonsos.com | 0x62A729CF
--
http://haqistan.net/~attila | att...@stalphonsos.com | 0x62A729CF
