On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 08:36:21AM +0000, Michal Bozon wrote: > I think the justification is: > > Why do i even need to revert a patch? Only because something got broken > by the last syspatch command, that may have applied multiple patches. > I might not now which patch caused the problem. > > If the problematic patch was not the last one from the set, > reverting with -r does not help, because it reverts single last patch only. > > Well, applying `syspatch -r` repeatedly is a sort of solution as well.
scratching head. well, we're talking patches on top of *stable*. The release is originally rather well tested. patches on top of that are applied conservatively, only to fix actual issues. I would really start worrying about our process if you actually need to 'revert patches until you find out which one causes the problem'.
