Thanks for your fast answer. I thought before, that the manual triage was the point.
Would the devs accept / use a bug tracker ? I ask because I find start something without the devs is burning time (see the .ru domain, the UI posts ... ). If someone of the developers is interested a off list discussion could maybe help. Regards, Christoph > Hi Christoph, > > Christoph R. Murauer wrote on Sun, Apr 01, 2018 at 01:56:47PM +0200: > >> not a problem from the OpenBSD developers ? > > There *is* an actual problem: Some bug reports are not processed > immediately because at the time they are posted, nobody happens to > find the time to investigate. Later on, when somebody would have > time to look, such unprocessd reports have low visibility because > they are nothing but an old posting on a mailing list, drowning in > a lot of noise from invalid and resolved reports. > > The task of a bugtracker would be > > 1. to collect as FEW as possible tickets - > ideally only valid, unprocessed ones with complete information > > 2. to close them when resolved such that the number of open tickets > stays low > > That's why manual triage and curation is the crucial point. > > Yours, > Ingo >
