On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 08:59:07PM +0100, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote: > On 10/30/18 8:46 PM, Chris Narkiewicz wrote: > > W dniu 30/10/2018 o??19:31, Peter N. M. Hansteen pisze: > >> yes, a well-known problem, and it's what nospamd (hinted at in the spamd > >> man pages) is for. > >> > >> To some extent it helps to whitelist IP addresses and networks that > >> domains list in their SPF info. > > > > Yeah, I hoped there are some reputable sources of validated mail > > sources based on SPF and DKIM. > > > > I'll give a try to your compiled list, but the fact you maintain > > it manually is a bit discouraging. > > Fortunately MX records and by extension SPF info per domain changes > infrequently enough that a semi-manually maintained list will be mostly > right, most of the time. > > But you're right in principle -- I *should* really take the time out to > recreate the list of domains that went into it and just re-generate with > smtpctl spf walk something like once per day or once per week. >
Like this ? https://github.com/Mailbrix/lists :-) -- Gilles Chehade https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
