>
>      My reasoning behind NOT installing the X, Comp and Game sets have
> little
> to do with saving space, although I am using an 8GB SSD. I learned in my
> research that one of the most fundamental ways to improve network/system
> security is to minimize the attack surface by not installing unneeded
> software. If it isn't installed, any potential vulnerabilities, known or
> not, are irrelevant.
>

What is not irrelevant is the person/program that somehow has a shell on
your box can paste the required 500 bytes of hex data into "openssl base64
-d" to get a binary on your system, so removing the Comp set is one of
those "it would be super hard for me to imagine what I need to run a local
privilege escalation so it must require all these tools" whereas the
hackers that do own other boxes will already have the short_ASM_sequence*
tested locally and only need to get those over the same path the exploit
took in order to get a better foothold on your machine.

So removing comp sets just mean you can't patch locally when a scary
advisory comes out, it also means you need to special-case your sysupgrades
and those two choices will probably mean you will stay vulnerable for a
longer time just because you hoped leaving cc(1),as(1) and battlestar(6)
out of the box will "save" you.

Yes, I can imagine some few scenarios where it might, but as the other
reply you already got says, when you make your own box a surprise to
administer and reason about, you are making it worse already so the
comparisons about what choice is safer doesn't even start from the same
level.

*) SEE ALSO: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SQL_Slammer

-- 
May the most significant bit of your life be positive.

Reply via email to