On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 1:08 AM Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org> wrote:
>
> On 2020-10-04, Amarendra Godbole <amarendra.godb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 1. config #1: MacBook - Linksys WRT1200AC  - xfinity cable modem
> > (speed: ~210 Mbits/s down, 6 Mbits/s up)
> > 2. config #2: MacBook - Linksys WRT1200AC - Ubiquiti ERL - xfinity
> > cable modem (speed: ~90 MBits down, 6 Mbits/s up)
> > 3. config #3 (Line speed): MacBook wired to cable modem (~230 Mbits/s
> > down, ~8 Mbits/s up).
>
> > cnmac0  1600  <Link>      a8:28:dc:cc:2e:6f 56088774     0 22283491  2688   
> >   0
> > cnmac1  1600  <Link>      78:8a:20:46:a8:c1 23646497     4 56569853    48   
> >   0
> > cnmac2  1600  <Link>      78:8a:20:46:a8:c2    14823     0   226198 226198  
> >    0
> > bridge0 1500  <Link>                        23187238     0 57022219     0   
> >   0
>
> Since "netlivelocks" is increasing, network performance will be impacted.
[...]

Based on several misc@ threads that's what I thought.

> Is it any better if you don't use bridge/vether, just use the cnmac interface
> directly?

I will try, and if you are referring to the MTU difference - that was
me messing around with stuff without understanding it. It did not
help, so I have reset everything back to 1500, and there is no change
in downlolad speed.

Name    Mtu   Network     Address              Ipkts Ifail    Opkts Ofail Colls
lo0     32768 <Link>                             224     0      224     0     0
lo0     32768 localhost/1 localhost              224     0      224     0     0
lo0     32768 fe80::%lo0/ fe80::1%lo0            224     0      224     0     0
lo0     32768 127/8       localhost              224     0      224     0     0
cnmac0  1500  <Link>      a8:28:dc:cc:2e:6f 63352305     0 24938774  2688     0
cnmac0  1500  73.231.60/2 c-73-231-60-128.h 63352305     0 24938774  2688     0
cnmac1  1500  <Link>      78:8a:20:46:a8:c1 26482574     4 63837095    48     0
cnmac2  1500  <Link>      78:8a:20:46:a8:c2    18483     0   273496 273496     0
enc0*   0     <Link>                               0     0        0     0     0
bridge0 1500  <Link>                        25929477     0 64384056     0     0
vether0 1500  <Link>      fe:e1:ba:d0:c8:a9 25770496     0 64110529     0     0
vether0 1500  192.168.10/ 192.168.10.1      25770496     0 64110529     0     0
pflog0  33136 <Link>                               0     0    31965     0     0

> Is it any better with a snapshot? (at present these haven't gone past
> 6.8 yet so you can still upgrade easily from there to release - just check
> to make sure it says "6.8" not "6.8-current" in the version number)
[...]

Will try with snapshot as well and report back later this week.

Thanks for your help.

-Amarendra

Reply via email to