On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 1:08 AM Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org> wrote:
>
> On 2020-10-04, Amarendra Godbole <amarendra.godb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 1. config #1: MacBook - Linksys WRT1200AC  - xfinity cable modem
> > (speed: ~210 Mbits/s down, 6 Mbits/s up)
> > 2. config #2: MacBook - Linksys WRT1200AC - Ubiquiti ERL - xfinity
> > cable modem (speed: ~90 MBits down, 6 Mbits/s up)
> > 3. config #3 (Line speed): MacBook wired to cable modem (~230 Mbits/s
> > down, ~8 Mbits/s up).
>
> > cnmac0  1600  <Link>      a8:28:dc:cc:2e:6f 56088774     0 22283491  2688   
> >   0
> > cnmac1  1600  <Link>      78:8a:20:46:a8:c1 23646497     4 56569853    48   
> >   0
> > cnmac2  1600  <Link>      78:8a:20:46:a8:c2    14823     0   226198 226198  
> >    0
> > bridge0 1500  <Link>                        23187238     0 57022219     0   
> >   0
>
> Since "netlivelocks" is increasing, network performance will be impacted.
>
> Is it any better if you don't use bridge/vether, just use the cnmac interface
> directly?

Yes indeed! I used cnmac directly, and saw an improvement in download
speed -- from ~90 Mbits/s it jumped to ~120 Mbits/s, and upload speed
increased as well from ~5 Mbits/s to ~7 Mbits/sec.

> Is it any better with a snapshot? (at present these haven't gone past
> 6.8 yet so you can still upgrade easily from there to release - just check
> to make sure it says "6.8" not "6.8-current" in the version number)
>

I'll try upgrading to snapshot in the next "maintenance window"
(typically Sunday mornings when the household is quiet). :-)

Thanks for the pointers.

-Amarendra

Reply via email to