>>> Igor Sobrado 7-Dec-06 19:29 >>> > > Attached is the first draft of the patch. Once it has been debugged I > will open a bug report on it. Please, check carefully all the entries
Don't create a bug report for this. This is not a bug. This is a change of style that you (and some others) would like to see in the FAQ. Nick, myself, and other people who work on the FAQ read misc@; there's no point just pi**ing us off by calling this a "bug". > diff -urNp www/faq1.html www.new/faq1.html > --- www/faq1.html 2006-12-07 17:05:55.000000000 +0100 > +++ www.new/faq1.html 2006-12-07 18:55:51.000000000 +0100 > @@ -275,7 +275,8 @@ Theo de Raadt, located in Canada. > > The OpenBSD team makes a new release every six months, with target release > dates in May and November. More information on the development cycle > -can be found <a href="faq5.html#Flavors">here</a>. > +can be found in the <a href="faq5.html#Flavors">OpenBSD's Flavors</a> > +subsection of this FAQ. I personally find this clunky. It now reads: "More information... can be found in the OpenBSD's Flavors subsection of this FAQ." I personally prefers something along the lines of "More information... can be found in section 5 of the FAQ." (with the link on "section 5 of the FAQ") But Nick and I discuss changes like this backwards and forwards quite a bit from time to time... that is why this is not a mechanical set of changes, but one that requires a lot of effort and no small ability with the English language > <a name="Included"></a> > <h2>1.8 - What is included with OpenBSD?</h2> > @@ -362,7 +363,7 @@ Of course, additional applications can b > <!-- XXXrelease --> > > The complete list of changes made to OpenBSD 3.9 to create OpenBSD 4.0 > -can be found <a href="../plus40.html">here</a>, however here are a few > +can be found in the <a href="../plus40.html">OpenBSD 4.0 changes</a> list, > however here are a few Here I personally prefer "... can be found in plus40.html." (with the link in the obvious place) (i.e. sometimes the general form "can be found at <a href="xxx">xxx</a>. works well. Especially since someone without an active link should be able to find the target without undue searching - at least, if this exercise is to be worthwhile). Keep on with this, though Many thanks Tom
