"J.C. Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > as suggested in release(8), I would guess it has something to do with > the pain the developers endure when building releases on very slow > archs
It's always better to run batch processing with nice. The only reason is not to affect normal work on the machine. This of course implies that it doesn't make sense to use nice when the machine is only doing this one lengthy job. Darrin Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > run the rebuild niced? > > I don't. I want it to be done as soon as possible. This doesn't give you much. But it may hurt responsiveness of your system as a whole. Regards, Frank