> $ lynx http://hiawatha.leisink.org > > Looking up hiawatha.leisink.org > Unable to locate remote host hiawatha.leisink.org. > Alert!: Unable to connect to remote host. > > lynx: Can't access startfile http://hiawatha.leisink.org/
What an extremely reliable webserver! (Yea, server-reliability != httpd-reliability, but SCNR. ;-) from http://web.archive.org/web/20070822005058/http://hiawatha.leisink.org/ : > Apache is a big fat cow and has a damn ugly configurationfile. "If I insult my brother, will you love me more then?" Hugo Leisink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So, to draw people's attention and to make them at least try > Hiawatha once, I have to make 'dangerous' statements like 'free of > security bugs'. "I had to lie on my application form, or I would never have gotten my foot in the door." > Second, the reponses to your message are typical for the OpenBSD > community. It's like they own the word 'security'. Only OpenBSD is > secure, the rest is not. But I guess I don't have to remind you about > http://pwnie-awards.org/winners.html#lamestvendor "You don't seem to be interested in hiring me. If I insult you, will you hire me then?" > And unless someone proves me wrong, my claim that > "Hiawatha is the most secure webserver" stands. Do you know what (non-)falsifiability is? Also, people took most exception to 'free of security bugs', not to "Hiawatha is the most secure webserver" (which is potentially non-falsifiable). >> 1. Would you let me forward this to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > I have no problems with that, but I think there will be enough OpenBSD > people not able to have a fair discussion about it (especially after my > second remark). "I'm afraid the people I've insulted will not be fair and impartial towards me." > I've had some discussions with OpenBSD people > before and too many of them weren't very pleasant. And you should ponder the question of why that is. > But if someone starts > saying that "Hiawatha is insecure and sucks because my coding style > doesn't match his" then the discussion is over for me. "I like making non-specific accusations, because the accused have a harder time refuting those." > And let's be > honest, critizing a piece of software by only looking at it's project > website and not having the guts to even look at the source code, THAT is > 'sheer stupidity'. "Your company would be *SO* stupid to reject me just because I lied on my application form. Your company would be *SO* cowardly not to invite me to an interview." > So, yes, I'm willing to talk again with the OpenBSD community. You've demonstrated that above. Or not. > I will > try to improve Hiawatha until they do like it. BUT.... not if words like > 'sucks', 'crap' and 'sheer stupidity' are being used. "I used words like 'sheer stupidity' on you in my email, but don't you dare using the same words on me or I will go on strike." > So, it's up to the OpenBSD community. "You guys have to take the initiative because I won't." On 07/12/2007, Jason George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Thought that his words could be useful. > > Only useful if you are trolling. QFT. > Hilter. Yes? http://ie.youtube.com/watch?v=ZU5aWyK9MRk > Ok, I'll take the bait: http://wiki.codemongers.com/Main Nginx? Never heard of it; but makes a good 1st impression: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nginx Ceterum censeo, these "let's replace abc with xyz" misc discussions are lame. --ropers
