Richard Stallman wrote: >... > On the other hand, if a distro's policies say something is allowed, > then it isn't a mistake, and I can't expect it to be fixed. That's > what gives me stronger concern. The presence of non-free programs > in the OpenBSD ports system is not a mistake, it's intentional.
Partitioning the non-free material from the free material in the ports would be a first step. There are many who might choose to put their efforts into a free tool (or start one if it is missing) if the licensing categories were more apparent. -Lars
