On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 02:58:10PM -0500, David H. Lynch Jr. wrote: > Marco Peereboom wrote: > > You can use OpenBSD to build a baby mulcher or a nookyoular weapon and > > you have the choice to retain the source code. > > > > You can use the GPL to build a puppy blood drainer or a dirty bomb > > provided you deliver the source code with it. > > > Agreed, but would you except either in ports ?
Yes. Why would I care? Everybody is entitled to their opinion. I am entitled to tell you if I think it is stupid. That, my friend, is free speech. > The question is not what is possible, but what are you willing to endorse. I don't do ports so I don't give a crap what's in it. I endorse nothing there. I use packages that I find convenient and yay ports guys for giving them to me. I am not that cocky to tell others what they should do with their computers. > > The purpose of the extreme example is to point out that including > something within > ports has meaning. It doesn't. Your example is foolish.
