Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 08:47:16AM -0600, Gilles Chehade wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 11:53:30AM +0000, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 05:49:42PM -0600, Gilles Chehade wrote:
Why didn't you answer my mail Rui ?
You are a troll.
Either I did and you missed it, or it wasn't the answer you'd expect or
I found it so irrelevant it didn't even raise any bell.
You have not answered at all, you have answered to other people so that
you could dodge my embarassing question instead of explaining why it is
different to do the exact same thing when you are from the FSF.
I'm not from the FSF.
According to YOU, it is okay to have emacs and gcc run on a proprietary
system as it allows more people to run free software. How is it that it
is wrong to allow more people to run a free system by giving them links
to proprietary software if it encourages them to keep their free system
instead of switching to a proprietary one ?
1) ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/ isn't "links"
2) using more free software is better than not running it at all
Using openbsd is using free software.. using MORE free software than
Windows Server 2003.
Using default openbsd and having an option to run Google search or ports
is the same as using GCC and Emacs on windows with having the option to
migrate to gnu/linux.. since ea lot of GCC users have never used
linux/gnu ever.
Same Thing.
Hypocrite thoughts are constructed in your mind the way you want to see
it.. the same way CULTS want you to see that their cult is right about
EVERYTHING and every other religion and church is wrong.
