Marco Peereboom wrote:
Alberto Gonzalez is that you?
at least in this case the excuse is somewhat valid, as richard is certainly old enough for the claim of "i cannot recall" to hold water. perhaps he should see a doctor about this?
in the case that richard is not in the initial stages of senility, he really should be a good boy and do his homework before he posts. if i were to post such misinformed inflammatory statements as richard has recently i would expect that my audience would lose confidence in my ability to lead. this is not leadership-grade behavior or rhetoric and if you expect to be regarded of any kind of leader you should suck it up, admit your follies, and, at the very least, exit the discussion since this is not your list.
the FSF must be very proud to have such a distinguished over-the-hill habitual error maker and social "genius" among their ranks! talk about an off-balance-sheet asset :P
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 11:18:10PM -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:Didn't you do that right from the start when you came to our lists to post the wrong conclusions you draw from your un-researched assumptions? That is not what happened. I stated an accurate conclusion based on recent research. I expressed it with words that were not clear. I've explained the details several times, so I won't repeat now.
