--- Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thus the combined work, THE WHOLE POINT OF WRITING IT, is under > the GPL. That IS what you just said. Which is forcing me into a > license for my project that I don't want. > > We require you to use, for your program that contains our code, > a license that protects the essential freedom for all its users. > That defends real freedom.
You mean your twisted definition of freedom. Btw, your own FAQ states that I can't BSD my code if I link to a GPL'd lib. Contrary to what you said I might add. I think you need to read your own FAQ. http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html And find out what freedom actually means: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/freedom I would comment further, and on other things, but I believe that you're too far gone to warrant any more time spent on this. At least from me and as it seems others as well. That is, until you gain some sanity. best regards, Reid Nichol President Bush says: War Is Peace Freedom Is Slavery Ignorance Is Strength ____________________________________________________________________________________ Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
