>>>>> "Douglas" == Douglas A Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Douglas> Of course, without an actual here's-my-problem issue to discuss, its Douglas> philosophical and hypothetical which allows us to argue over the Douglas> periphery instead of the core issue. Douglas> Is there any scenario where one could not easily ship a product that Douglas> uses OpenBSD with its perl interpreter intact? How many times do we have to say "Perl's license is Artistic 2.0 which is roughly as broad (if not even a tiny bit broader) than BSD's own?" Are you not paying attention in the thread to the three prior times I (and others) have already said this? -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/> Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.vox.com/ for Smalltalk and Seaside discussion
