its shows that some poor trolls here dont own ultraportables with no external drives, and use more than one os alternative.
i pass data from bsd to fat 32 so in m$ its then copy onto ntfs, i have 1 disk - 8 os, nothing is being done , but more and more ultraportables sells, yes it could be resolv into using an ext2 partition instead, but that is not resolving a problem its going around it covering eyes and ears. my stuff works, its just a pain , and ffs driver in windooz cant read more than one disklabel. bsd suggest using more than one partition, in that problem , one is the solution, next time i wont RTFM, and do as i see fit because their more opinions than guidlines. now as for backwards bsd. why does freebsd write to ntfs? why does osx write to ntfs.. seems to me that is more some obstination done not to support it. shure im doing it wrong , because nothing is being done. but shure a color-ls.pkg is more important if you ask me, SARCASTIC neko --- On Sun, 10/26/08, Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: NTFS-3G Stable Read/Write Driver ready to merge on cvs obsd ? > To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: "misc@openbsd.org" <misc@openbsd.org> > Date: Sunday, October 26, 2008, 1:02 PM > If you need to write to ntfs, you're doing it wrong. > > On Oct 25, 2008, at 9:12 PM, Neko > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > so there can be an end to this retard "cant write > on the file > > system" bs > > > > http://www.ntfs-3g.org/ > > > > > > so will it be merged in the next obsd release ? > > this is the future. people use multiple os on their > machine, not just > > vm , they will local install too, so action should be > taken to have > > a filesystem stream that can be viewed by anyone, > > > > > > neko
