On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 8:17 AM, Felipe Alfaro Solana <felipe.alf...@gmail.com> wrote: > We could debate why OpenBSD is inherently more secure than Windows (in > fact we could debate why almost any operating system is inherently > more secure than Windows). The point here is OpenBSD is inherently > more secure because of the development process, because it's > completely open source software, because there are great developers > that understand problems and know how to solve them and code it > properly, because there is a big community behind, etc, etc.
The key point of what you said, which I think is important to note, is that OpenBSD is "more secure." It's easy to prove, and correct to say, that OpenBSD is more secure than other operating systems. It's much harder to prove that OpenBSD is secure. But, that's also up for debate depending on if you interpret "secure" to be synonymous with "secure enough" or with "completely secure." Ian
