On Sun, May 10, 2009 16:09, Kaltashkin Eugene wrote: > Vadim Zhukov wrote: >> On Sunday 10 May 2009 22:40:18 Kaltashkin Eugene wrote: >> >>> Hi ppls. >>> >>> On my EEEPC 1000H i cannot use any program which use direct access to >>> my Ralink 2860 :( >>> i'm not see any devices in /dev named ral0, but many programs, for >>> example: wmwlmon, wmnetload see my card correctly. >>> How i can resolve this problem ? >>> Maybe who know some params for mknod or another way ? >>> >> >> Well, you should start from reading some Unix literature first... >> >> Network devices are not presented in filesystem because it creates too >> much overhead. If you want to do that you should definitely go to >> Hurd... What programs do you run that require such access? What do you >> want to do this way? >> > for example dstumbler > zhecka:/home/zhecka# /usr/local/sbin/dstumbler > usage: /usr/local/sbin/dstumbler <device> [-d] [-osn] [-m <int>] [-g > <gps device>] [-l <logfile>] > zhecka:/home/zhecka# /usr/local/sbin/dstumbler /dev/ral0 > error: unable to ioctl device socket: Device not configured > > zhecka:/home/zhecka# /usr/local/sbin/dwepdump -w -s /dev/ral0 123 > > * dwepdump v0.2 by h1kari <h1k...@dachb0den.com> * > * Copyright (c) Dachb0den Labs 2002 [http://dachb0den.com] * > > starting pcap capture loop... > device: /dev/ral0 > error: unable to open device for packet capture: /dev/ral0: Device not > configured > > somebody generate wrong packets on my wifi channel and block access to > my ap. > i need dump some info from air packets for detect this intruder and > block it by mac.
you should not use /dev/ral0. use just ral0 instead. matheus -- We will call you cygnus, The God of balance you shall be A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
