On 28 March 2010 c. 04:25:53 Paul M wrote:
> Is softraid(4) now concidered suitable for use in production
> environments?
>
> I know that many people have used it for a long time with no problems,
> but that is not my question.
>
> I see that the bioctl man page lists the RAID 4 & 5 disciplines as
> 'experimental' - I'm specificly interested in RAID0.
>
> I've been looking forward to switching from RAIDFrame for some time,
> here's hoping that 4.7 will be that time.
>
>
> I appreciate the fine work all the devs have done, and am extremely
> gratefull to you all that I'm able to use such a fine OS.
> Thank You.
Well, if you'll install 4.7 then you'll have to re-create RAID when
updating to 4.8 - the softraid metadata format was changed to support
booting from softraid volume in -CURRENT recently. Otherwise, I did not
hear any crash reports.
--
Best wishes,
Vadim Zhukov
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
