Hi, yeah, I have used PLUS, and they support a lot of tracker, ultrasound and video devices, and could stream data via OpenIGTLink into MITK, which is all great! (Thanks to all the people involved).
But, I’m thinking that if you have stereo, RGB(A), HD video (1920x1080), then you don’t want to do this over a network connection, so a direct interface would be better? So, (a) networked via OpenIGTLink and (b) direct, for both ultrasound and video are all valid use-cases depending on performance requirements. Matt > On 18 Sep 2015, at 14:06, Sebastian Ordas <sebastian.or...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Matt, have you looked into Plus? they support Ultrasonix and a couple more US > devices http://perk-software.cs.queensu.ca/plus/doc/nightly/user/Devices.html > The easiest would be to send the video stream (and synchronized tracking data > if you want) from PlusServer via OpenIGTLink to your mitk-based application > There is already in MITK (working branch > bug-17944-OpenIGTLinkPluginForUltrasound) a class mitkImageToIGTLMessageFilter > you will need to implement the other way round: e.g. > mitk::IGTLMessageToImageFilter > Alfred, any other hint for connecting MITK with Plus? Is anyone interested in > joining efforts on this? > > regards, > sebastian > > On 17/09/2015 12:24 p.m., Clarkson, Matt wrote: >> Would anyone be interested in Ultrasonix? > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ mitk-users mailing list mitk-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mitk-users
