Well, I was thinking more about voxelwise ground truth fiber orientations, which would be useful if one wants to compare voxelwise orientation estimates vs ground truth orientations. If you draw an arbitrary fibre shape, you do not really have the exact voxelwise orientation will be from this ground truth shape.
Hope this is clearer? Best Stam On 19 Oct 2015, at 13:20, Goch, Caspar Jonas <c.g...@dkfz-heidelberg.de> wrote: > Hi Stam, > > I am not entirely sure what you are looking for. The ground truth fibers are > the ones you "drew" yourself. You can save those separately of course, or do > you want something different? > > Best, > Caspar > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Stamatios Sotiropoulos [mailto:stamatios.sotiropou...@ndcn.ox.ac.uk] > Gesendet: Montag, 19. Oktober 2015 12:39 > An: Goch, Caspar Jonas > Cc: mitk-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Betreff: Re: [mitk-users] Fiberfox diffusion MRI simulator - Inconsistency > between documentation and released version? > > Thank you Caspar > > I managed to build the latest source code OK and also found out that Qt 5 > does not work on a Mac (I had to revert to 4.8 to make the GUI work properly). > > One last question, once I simulate an image, is there any way to extract the > simulated "ground truth" values per image voxel? I can see that the > Compartment volume fractions can be generated, but what about fiber > orientations? > > Best > Stam > > > > On 19 Oct 2015, at 11:31, Goch, Caspar Jonas <c.g...@dkfz-heidelberg.de> > wrote: > >> Hi Stam, >> >> as far as I am aware there is currently no definite date for the next >> MITK Diffusion binary release. However, you can always build it >> yourself, as the source code is freely available [1]. There have been >> however some major changes to the source code (e.g. the removal of >> mitk::DiffusionImage in favor of directly using mitk::Image), which >> might result in it being less stable than a regular release. If you >> have no experience building MITK, take a look at the developer >> documentation [2]. Please note we currently recommend Qt 5.X, X < 5 >> (unless you are using Mac, in which case you need Qt 4.8.Y) >> >> Hope this helps, >> Caspar >> >> [1] http://mitk.org/wiki/Downloads#MITK_Source_Code >> [2] http://docs.mitk.org/nightly/StartingDevelopment.html >> >> >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> Von: Stamatios Sotiropoulos >> [mailto:stamatios.sotiropou...@ndcn.ox.ac.uk] >> Gesendet: Sonntag, 18. Oktober 2015 10:14 >> An: mitk-users@lists.sourceforge.net >> Betreff: [mitk-users] Fiberfox diffusion MRI simulator - Inconsistency >> between documentation and released version? >> >> Hi >> >> I am interested in the excellent Fiberfox simulator and the Advanced >> simulation options. I can see there are plenty of them mentioned in the >> documentation http://docs.mitk.org/nightly/org_mitk_views_fiberfoxview.html, >> which however are not available in the latest released version >> http://mitk.org/wiki/Download#MITK_Diffusion (for instance "Acquisition >> Type", "Dwell Time", "Coil Sensitivity", T1 specification of compartments, >> etc). >> >> Is there any plan for a new release of MITK_Diffusion in the near future >> that will include these features? Or can I access them if I get the latest >> source code and compile myself? Does this mean that these features are not >> yet stable enough? >> >> Many thanks >> Stam >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> -------- _______________________________________________ >> mitk-users mailing list >> mitk-users@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mitk-users > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ mitk-users mailing list mitk-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mitk-users
