On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 18:31 +0100, Sean M. Pappalardo - D.J. Pegasus wrote: > > On 03/19/2012 06:17 PM, Owen Williams wrote: > > To start with I'm going to do deck-sync, ironically because it's the > > most demanding (esp with scratching) but also because I can put off > > learning midi a little longer. > > Also, and please excuse me if this is obvious, it seems to me that it > would be easiest to create a single central clock (that can be a MIDI > clock master or slave,) then all other parts of Mixxx would sync to (or > set the speed of) that source via whatever internal method you create. > Then "deck sync" would just be a matter of one virtual deck setting that > central source, and the other(s) syncing to it via that internal method.
Yup that's exactly what I'm doing. The master sync will broadcast a bpm value (for instant adjustment) as well as sync pulses. owen ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF email is sponsosred by: Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure _______________________________________________ Mixxx-devel mailing list Mixxx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mixxx-devel
