On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, Michael Hanke wrote:
> I'm using the recommendation -t 3 by Steven Boswell. The source material is
> very (not to say extremly) noisy.
I think the recommendation for extremely noisy material is '-t 4'
(and I have used 5 for the worst material). That parameter has a
large influence on the speed of y4mdenoise.
The manpage currently gives these guidlines:
-t 1 : Digital cable TV, most LaserDiscs, DV camcorder video
-t 2 : VHS camcorder video, commercially-produced videotapes
-t 3 : Analog cable TV, VHS videotape (at the 2-hour speed)
-t 4 : VHS videotape (at the 6-hour speed)
EP (6hr) mode VHS is about as low quality (especially if the
tapes are old - the ones I just finished processing had developed
a very noticeable colorcast) as one can get and still have a picture ;)
> architecture. In my case, this may also be a part of the problem because my
> RAM is slow (PC133), too.
The bottleneck in this case is probably not the speed of the RAM but
instead the number of cpu cycles/second
> Did anyone try to use alternative compilers?
Never got around to doing that. It was simpler (or so it seemed)
to get a faster system ;)
Cheers,
Steven Schultz
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Mjpeg-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users
