I think that's exactly backwards - the rubber front mount, similar to the imfamous A1 passenger side mount, fails after X thousand miles and has been retrofitted with different style of mount which is similar to that of the passenger rear mount. FWIW, the early style mount is NOT what VW Motorsport copied for their mounts - go figure.
--- [email protected] wrote: > In a message dated 1/30/00 9:04:46 AM Pacific Standard Time, > [email protected] > writes: > > << The front engine mount changed at some point as well > with the hydraullic version being preferable. >> > > Hydraulic is bad. > Rubber mount does not cause extra vibrations, and last longer, and > is better. > > Alex. > _____________ > List Sponsor: http://www.netsville.com > To remove yourself from this list, send mail to > [email protected] with 'unsubscribe a2_16v' in the body of > your message > See us on the web at http://www.a2-16v.com > Visit the 16V Homepage at http://www.gti16v.org > ===== Matthew Yip [email protected] http://www.geocities.com/mgyip/ '87 GTi 16v - x2 '88 M5 '99 F350 __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com _____________ List Sponsor: http://www.netsville.com To remove yourself from this list, send mail to [email protected] with 'unsubscribe a2_16v' in the body of your message See us on the web at http://www.a2-16v.com Visit the 16V Homepage at http://www.gti16v.org
