They're black, round and cheap. That's about it. They're not a very good performing tire in all out dry performance. They're decent in the wet and wear pretty well. You get what you pay for in tires.
The new Kumho MX is an outstanding performing tire, putting up comparable performance to the S03 and Pilot for about half the price. -josh --- Les Noriel <[email protected]> wrote: > I would agree with Eric. I've used them on my > Corrado in a 205/40ZR17 and they are smooth and > quiet. The grip is quite good compared to other > tires I have tried. I don't use them on the track so > I cannot vouch for their track worthiness, but on > twisty canyon roads they work well. I also don't > have any problems with hydroplaning in the rain. > They remain stable and straight when encountering > large amounts of H20. > > Les > -------Original Message------- > From: Patrick Austin <[email protected]> > Sent: 05/29/03 08:32 AM > To: a2list <[email protected]> > Subject: [a2-16v-list] Kumho ECSTA 712's > > > > > Any opinions on the ECSTA's? $74/each, mounted > and balanced in > 205/55/15...cheaper than I can get the Yokohama AVS > ES100's. The car > will see mostly street use with an occasional > autocross...Azenis would > probably wear a bit too fast and don't look like > they'd be very great in > the rain. > > _______________________________________________ > a2-16v-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.a2-16v.com/mailman/listinfo/a2-16v-list > For list archives, see listinfo link above. > > > _______________________________________________ > a2-16v-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.a2-16v.com/mailman/listinfo/a2-16v-list > For list archives, see listinfo link above. ===== __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM). http://calendar.yahoo.com
