Hi Mark, > > My Edge 705 calculates a 22.7 km route to Pasila railway station > > just fine, except that it now seems to favor smaller roads with more > > intersections. What do you think, would it be worthwhile to have > > some middle ground for Table A? Not one entry per arc nor one entry > > per way, but an entry per a configureable number or distance of arcs, > > perhaps? > > Not sure about that but I do think that this warrants some more work to > try and understand exactly what the constraint is. It's interesting > that it doesn't appear to have any effect on mapsource (or the etrex, > as far as I can tell). I don't favour making it configurable because > then the map makers would need to say what units their maps are > compatible with. Far simpler to take the hit on map size (and possibly > routing performance) until we know what's really happening.
I did not really mean user-configurable but a compile-time parameter, similar to MAX_ARC_LENGTH. Marko _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev