Well the problem with freenx / neatx is precisely that - they are
unmaintained. I don't want to go for an unmaintained project.



Ramon Casha


On 9 December 2011 10:19, Raphael Borg Ellul Vincenti
<[email protected]>wrote:

> 2X had a terminal server which is based off NoMachine.
> It might be oldish and unmaintained as they dropped the project.
>
> http://www.2x.com/downloads/#termserver
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Ramon Casha <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Damn, I just found the catch with NX... The "free server" available from
>> nomachine is actually a stripped-down version that is limited to 2
>> sessions, and it seems that FreeNX and NeatX are both dead. Is there a
>> decent, non-restricted, open source terminal server for Linux available?
>>
>>
>>
>> Ramon Casha
>>
>>
>>
>> On 8 December 2011 12:06, Anton Xuereb <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> You could use something like nitrogen and then run nitrogen --restore to
>>> restore desktop
>>> On Dec 8, 2011 11:24 AM, "Ramon Casha" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> So far I like what I did with openbox/fbpanel/idesk.
>>>>
>>>> I'm using openbox which has a desktop right-click menu that is
>>>> configured via an xml file, so I can provide these users with a preset menu
>>>> without f'ing up the normal menu for anybody else. In addition I have
>>>> fbpanel which provides a task bar, launchers and notify area at the bottom,
>>>> and idesk which adds launcher icons to the desktop as well as set a
>>>> wallpaper (fbpanel and idesk are also configured via simple xml files).
>>>> Once I've fully configured the user I can turn it into a home-directory
>>>> skeleton for adduser, and set the owner of the config files to root so the
>>>> user can't change anything.
>>>>
>>>> Apart from other advantages I have a really super-fast-loading desktop.
>>>>
>>>> Now I'll set up a shell script which checks if the user is a member of
>>>> a particular linux group, and if so always launches this openbox session,
>>>> otherwise launching the regular Gnome / KDE / other desktop, and set it as
>>>> the command to launch Gnome/KDE/etc in NX.
>>>>
>>>> One pending question... does anyone know how to make a script respond
>>>> to a change in desktop size? I want to re-run the command that sets the
>>>> wallpaper if possible.
>>>>
>>>> Ramon Casha
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 8 December 2011 08:56, Raphael Borg Ellul Vincenti <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I had once done something of the sort using fvwm.
>>>>> On Dec 8, 2011 6:59 AM, "Ramon Casha" <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I could give it a try. Do you know if you can customise the panels /
>>>>>> menu / etc. and then lock them down so that the user can't launch 
>>>>>> anything
>>>>>> except the provided menu links?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ramon Casha
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 7 December 2011 19:41, Philip Serracino Inglott 
>>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> did you consider LXDE?
>>>>>>> It uses Openbox anyway and is the desktop environment of Lubuntu
>>>>>>> which I've had a good experience with.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> Philip
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 7 December 2011 15:13, Ramon Casha <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yep, me too. Gnome Shell and Unity are constantly competing for
>>>>>>>> suckiness.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ramon Casha
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 7 December 2011 14:10, Anton Xuereb <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> honestly...i don't know who actually still uses gnome 3....people
>>>>>>>>> at work had nothing but problems with it..
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> i changed over to mint 11 and still on gnome 2.3 atm
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 7 December 2011 13:52, Ramon Casha <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Raphael is right. It's about dumb / diskless terminals so there's
>>>>>>>>>> a lot about PXE booting etc which I don't need.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I think I've found what I wanted though - a combination of
>>>>>>>>>> openbox + idesk to handle the desktop icons + fbpanel to provide a 
>>>>>>>>>> panel at
>>>>>>>>>> the bottom. I completely gave up on Gnome. The latest policy of 
>>>>>>>>>> "can't
>>>>>>>>>> change any settings" means I can't get it to work as I want it to :(
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Ramon Casha
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 7 December 2011 13:34, Raphael Borg Ellul Vincenti <
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> LTSP is strictly about dumb terminals. Thats not what you always
>>>>>>>>>>> need.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On a sidenote, Jonathan, please fix your email client. It screws
>>>>>>>>>>> up the threading of the mailing list.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>  On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Jonathan Aquilina <
>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>  There is the Linux Terminal Services Project which I think is
>>>>>>>>>>>> what you would want for your given project :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>   Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Jonathan Aquilina
>>>>>>>>>>>>   Get a signature like this.
>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://r1.wisestamp.com/r/landing?promo=18&dest=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wisestamp.com%2Femail-install%3Futm_source%3Dextension%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_campaign%3Dpromo_18>
>>>>>>>>>>>>  Click
>>>>>>>>>>>> here.<http://r1.wisestamp.com/r/landing?promo=18&dest=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wisestamp.com%2Femail-install%3Futm_source%3Dextension%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_campaign%3Dpromo_18>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>> MLUG-list mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>> MLUG-list mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> MLUG-list mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> MLUG-list mailing list
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> MLUG-list mailing list
>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> MLUG-list mailing list
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> MLUG-list mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> MLUG-list mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> MLUG-list mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> MLUG-list mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> MLUG-list mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> MLUG-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>
>
_______________________________________________
MLUG-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list

Reply via email to