On Jan 9, 2014, at 5:25 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter <head...@headius.com> wrote:
> It depends how JRuby is deployed. If the same code runs in every JRuby > runtime, then there would be one value attached to a given class per > runtime. Generally, this does not exceed a few dozen JRuby instances > for an individual app, and most folks don't deploy more than a few > apps in a given JVM. Interesting. Thanks for the information. > > - Charlie > > On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Christian Thalinger > <christian.thalin...@oracle.com> wrote: >> >> On Jan 9, 2014, at 2:46 AM, Jochen Theodorou <blackd...@gmx.org> wrote: >> >>> Am 08.01.2014 21:45, schrieb Christian Thalinger: >>> [...] >>>> If we’d go with an initial value of 1 would it be a performance problem >>>> for you if it grows automatically? >>> >>> that means the map will have to grow for hundreds of classes at startup. >>> I don't know how much impact that will have >> >> If it’s only hundreds it’s probably negligible. You could do a simple >> experiment if you are worried: change ClassValueMap.INITIAL_ENTRIES to 1, >> compile it and prepend it to the bootclasspath. >> >>> >>> bye Jochen >>> >>> -- >>> Jochen "blackdrag" Theodorou - Groovy Project Tech Lead >>> blog: http://blackdragsview.blogspot.com/ >>> german groovy discussion newsgroup: de.comp.lang.misc >>> For Groovy programming sources visit http://groovy-lang.org >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> mlvm-dev mailing list >>> mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net >>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev >> >> _______________________________________________ >> mlvm-dev mailing list >> mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev > _______________________________________________ > mlvm-dev mailing list > mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev _______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
