You might want to take a look at the Waratek JVM - it has an interesting approach to this problem.
Thanks, Ben On 12 Jan 2014 23:15, "Mark Roos" <mr...@roos.com> wrote: > From Charles > I forgot to mention: more and more users are going with exactly one > JRuby runtime per app, and most Ruby folks deploy one app in a given > > I have been pondering the merits of apps with a shared jvm ( protection is > provided via a > sandbox) vs independent jvms per app. Since they are all communicating > via messages the > thought of avoiding serialization is appealing. I am looking at the Kilim > approach to object > isolation which adds some complexity but does support the concept of > passing ownership > of objects between the sandboxes (Actors). > > Any others have thoughts on how one might best do this 'Erlang' like > approach? > > thx > mark > _______________________________________________ > mlvm-dev mailing list > mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev > >
_______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
