On Tuesday, July 10, 2012 01:11:33 PM pharmtech wrote: > I agree. But, isn't there a way to catch up in a more efficient manner > than just working through the backlog of cards in their order due?
When I said 'most urgent first', I did not mean 'most overdue first', but rather 'shortest interval first'. If you have a card which you last reviewed 500 days ago, postponing it to 502 days will not make much a difference, so that overdue card is low priority. That heuristic is a nice compromise between effectiveness and speed. Cheers, Peter -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mnemosyne-proj-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mnemosyne-proj-users?hl=en.
