On Wednesday, July 11, 2012 02:49:16 AM pharmtech wrote: > I still think a "risk of forgetting" factor (overdue / interval) would > be a more meaningful way to prioritize the catchup effort.
Perhaps, but as I said, the current implementation is a nice compromise between software speed and memory effectiveness. Peter -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mnemosyne-proj-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mnemosyne-proj-users?hl=en.
