Noone has opinions on this? Cheers,
/Per On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Per Cederberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The two functions MochiKit.DOM.isChildNode and isParent have both been > added in version 1.4 of MochiKit (not yet stable). But they are > virtually identical (except for a few bugs I'm in fixing right now). > The only difference, according to the API docs, as far as I can tell > is: > > isChildNode(node, node) --> true > isParent(node, node) --> false > > Is it not pointless to keep both functions around? Since isChildNode() > is more tested (and probably more used), I'd suggest removing > isParent() from the API before the 1.4 release. Possibly, in order to > simplify the transition, we could just alias isParent to isChildNode > (and remove the API doc specification so that noone will use it from > now on). > > Opinions? > > Cheers, > > /Per > > PS. I just discovered that Google Groups silently dropped all my > emails that used another sender address, so I'm currently resending > all my recent postings. Hence the sudden email bombing... > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MochiKit" group. To post to this group, send email to mochikit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mochikit?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
