Per Cederberg wrote: > Both actually do that. Ah, right. Overlooked the recursive call in the last line of isParent. Then both names are really misleading. It's completely unusual to call a not direct ancestor "parent" or a not direct descendant "child".
And there's really no reason to keep them both, or making one the alias of the other. If both functions are there, then they should have least swapped arguments, like here: http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/idshelp/v111/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.dbext.doc/dbext270.htm -- Christoph --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MochiKit" group. To post to this group, send email to mochikit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mochikit?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
