Hi Florian, *, Am 26.10.2011 16:45 schrieb Florian Effenberger:
> at least once a week, I even get mislead mails from one of our admins, > who I think of being technically very experienced. The admin lists > doesn't have reply-to mangling, and lots of content is missing on the > list, because people always reply to me directly. I don't see the problem, to resend such a mail to the list after a hint.. [..] > I have seen users of mutt, Google Mail and a few other mail clients > complaining. I've seen comlaining many people many things ;o)). As said it's a matter of rising efficiency of mail communication in general rather than running after (or ignoring) personal complaints. [..] > My take would be to use one of the more prominent lists to try out the > results - preferably users@, or in case we want to exclude that list, > something like discuss@ could be a good starter. Agreed. But before changing anything, I'll go and look to make the posting guidelines more descriptive in terms of making essential information available instantly. I'll come back here, when done. If anyone want's to participate the work - welcome! :o)). > In case pure chaos arises, we need to rethink the strategy, in case > things work out well, we might adapt that for other lists. Changing without complementary action will deliver the prove of chaos arising. :o)). > What do you think? Your take, changing discuss@ is a good one, but some care is needed to make it a success. Friedrich -- Friedrich Strohmaier - Admin team - The Document Foundation http://www.documentfoundation.org/ -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/moderators/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
