On Mon, 10 Jan 2000, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
> Vivek Khera wrote:
> >
> > >>>>> "JB" == Jason Bodnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > JB> Actually, prior art prohibits something from being patented. If
> > JB> somebody can demonstrate that the pantented concept is not new due
> > JB> to prior art then the patent office will not issue the patent.
> >
> > So, to all of you, what does this have to do with mod_perl? This
> > certainly is not a patent-reform mailing list. Please take this
> > discussion somewhere more appropriate. Thanks.
>
> Oh be serious. A patent on a programming language embedded in a markup
> langauge would have a serious effect on the mod_perl community. There
> are several such languages which work with mod_perl, and at least two of
> them are supported directly on this list.
Wasn't Advocacy mod_perl list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> created just for
that and similar purposes?
_______________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.stason.org/stas
Perl,CGI,Apache,Linux,Web,Java,PC http://www.stason.org/stas/TULARC
perl.apache.org modperl.sourcegarden.org perlmonth.com perl.org
single o-> + single o-+ = singlesheaven http://www.singlesheaven.com
