martin langhoff sent the following bits through the ether:

> Acmemail is nicely documented, and seems 'ready to go' (tempting!),
> although I fear it may not be as configurable as I want. Do you know
> anything about it? 

As the main developer of acmemail, I'd actually go for WING - acmemail
is getting there, but recently development has slowed quite a lot. We
have lots of great plans but not really enough time to implement
anything. It currently scales fairly badly too. OTOH the documentation
is very good, and, of course, it's very pretty ;-)

It looked like we were getting critical mass with the number of people
interested in helping development, but no-one has actually contributed
any code recently. It *was* going to make a good case on how open
source development can succeed :-(

Development will start again as soon as yapc::Europe is over and
people get back from holiday, honest. Scalability will really only
happen when I can get some beefy servers to test it on.

btw you could have asked this on the acmemail and WING lists,
surely?

Leon
-- 
Leon Brocard.............................http://www.astray.com/
yapc::Europe - September 22-24 London - http://yapc.org/Europe/

... Error 404: .signature generator ran out of tuits

Reply via email to