-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, G.W. Haywood wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, Drew Taylor wrote:
> > "G.W. Haywood" wrote:
> > > > > GWH> Do you think this one could go off-List now?
> > > > No; I find it quite useful to help form my own descision
> > > OK, you win, I'm outvoted.
> >
> > I will say that the topic has greatly veered from the original subject.
> > How about we continue the discussion with appropriate subject lines?
>
> [OT] ?
We're still talking about mod_perl. This is stuff we use all the time.
I'd say that it's very much ON topic. Maybe we'll use [OT] and say that
it means "on topic". I think a lot of people are getting started here
and the discussion is helpful. I also think that these discussions are
going to make a better comparison guide.
- --
"The Funk, the whole Funk, and nothing but the Funk."
Billy Donahue <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: pgpenvelope 2.9.0 - http://pgpenvelope.sourceforge.net/
iD8DBQE5tS60+2VvpwIZdF0RAiFMAJ9SB6tPEDnIm60SRHBZ1a2og+ZLpQCfbmmO
LB9oyYjveekW2z394O1YHBM=
=rJBX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
