"One or two mod_perlers could do the
work of a java shop of ten in half the time."
Can we prove this ?
Does anyone have any real evidence to support this claim.
I hope so because I need to defend my use of mod_perl in developing the
intranet site for my company ;-)
All my experience suggests that this is true but sometimes the PHB's
insist on the numbers.
Simon.
From ed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date 26
September 2000
To
Gunther Birznieks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Time 20:50
Copy to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (bcc: Simon Wilcox/BASE/WilliamsLea)
Bcc Simon Wilcox/BASE/WilliamsLea
Fax to
Subject Re: tracking down why a module was loaded?;
Gunther Birznieks wrote:
> I unfortunately have to agree.
> <snip>
> And in the end, the salaries for mod_perl programmers
> are pretty high right now because of it -- so will a system really cost
> less to develop in mod_perl than in Java if Java programmers are becoming
> less expensive than mod_perl programmers?
> </snip>
Mod_perl programmers are more expensive as individuals,
because mod_perl is more powerful, and allows you access
to the Apache API; mod_perlers are more saavy.
One or two mod_perlers could do the
work of a java shop of ten in half the time. Still a savings.
Not to mention the hardware that goes with Java by fiat!
ed
______________________________________________________________________
This email contains proprietary information some or all of which may be
legally privileged. It is for the intended recipient only. If an addressing
or transmission error has misdirected this email, please notify the author by
replying to this email. If you are not the intended recipient you must not
use, disclose, distribute, copy, print, or reply on this email.
